Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Leisure v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Leisure v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

89 Ohio St. 3d 110
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 7, 2000
DocketNos. 98-2110 and 98-2481
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 89 Ohio St. 3d 110 (Leisure v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leisure v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 89 Ohio St. 3d 110 (Ohio 2000).

Opinions

The court hereby, sua sponte, consolidates these two cases for disposition.

The judgments of the court of appeals are affirmed to the extent they vacated the default judgments. The causes are remanded to the trial court with instructions to permit plaintiffs to serve the Attorney General in accordance with R.C. 2721.12 and Cicco v. Stockmaster (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 95, 728 N.E.2d 1066.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. [111]*111Douglas, J., concurs in judgment. Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sturgill v. Worcester, Unpublished Decision (5-1-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2002
In Re Adoption of Coppersmith
761 N.E.2d 1163 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001)
Leisure v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.
736 N.E.2d 904 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Leisure v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
2000 Ohio 229 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Leisure v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
89 Ohio St. 3d 523 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 Ohio St. 3d 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leisure-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-ohio-2000.