Leigh v. State

107 S.E. 284, 26 Ga. App. 637, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 572
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 13, 1921
Docket12171
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 S.E. 284 (Leigh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leigh v. State, 107 S.E. 284, 26 Ga. App. 637, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 572 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinions

Luke, J.

The motion for a new trial being based upon the general grounds only, and there being some evidence to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, this court is without power to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Indictment for carrying pistol; from Douglas superior court — — Judge Irwin. December 30, 1920. Astor Merritt, for plaintiff in error. J. R. Hutcheson, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foy v. State
127 S.E. 619 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 S.E. 284, 26 Ga. App. 637, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leigh-v-state-gactapp-1921.