Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Leigh v. State

Leigh v. State

107 S.E. 284, 26 Ga. App. 637, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 572
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 13, 1921·No. 12171·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Luke, J.

The motion for a new trial being based upon the general grounds only, and there being some evidence to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, this court is without power to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. Indictment for carrying pistol; from Douglas superior court — — Judge Irwin. December 30, 1920. Astor Merritt, for plaintiff in error. J. R. Hutcheson, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leigh v. State, 107 S.E. 284, 26 Ga. App. 637, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 572 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

107 S.E. 284 (Leigh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foy v. State
127 S.E. 619 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)