Foy v. State
This text of 127 S.E. 619 (Foy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where the accused had a pistol in his manual possession, on the public road,- without the license required by the act of 1910 (Ga. L. 1910, p. 134), the case was within the express terms of the act, notwithstanding the accused was the owner of the land on both sides of the road along which he carried the pistol. Cheney v. State, 10 Ga. App, 451 (73 S. E. 617); Leigh v. State, 26 Ga. App. 638 (107 S. E. 284).
(a) This principle controls every ground of error in this case, and the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial was not erroneous for any reason assigned.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 S.E. 619, 33 Ga. App. 676, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/foy-v-state-gactapp-1925.