Lehman Bros. Intl. v. AG Fin. Prods., Inc.

2024 NY Slip Op 01346
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 14, 2024
DocketIndex No. 653284/11 Appeal No. 1845 Case No. 2023-03409
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 01346 (Lehman Bros. Intl. v. AG Fin. Prods., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lehman Bros. Intl. v. AG Fin. Prods., Inc., 2024 NY Slip Op 01346 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Lehman Bros. Intl. v AG Fin. Prods., Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 01346)
Lehman Bros. Intl. v AG Fin. Prods., Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 01346
Decided on March 14, 2024
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: March 14, 2024
Before: Webber, J.P., Oing, González, Kennedy, Shulman, JJ.

Index No. 653284/11 Appeal No. 1845 Case No. 2023-03409

[*1]Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in Administration), Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

AG Financial Products, Inc., Defendant-Respondent.


Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, New York (Andrew J. Rossman of counsel), for appellant.

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York (Roger A. Cooper of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Melissa A. Crane, J.), entered June 30, 2023, dismissing plaintiff's remaining cause of action after a bench trial and awarding defendant/counterclaim plaintiff $20,663,300.20, plus interest, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We affirm for the reasons set forth in Supreme Court's well-reasoned decision.

"In a nonjury trial, the decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed upon appeal unless it is obvious that the court's conclusions could not be reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence" (Watts v State of New York, 25 AD3d 324 [1st Dept 2006] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, there is no basis to disturb the trial court's determination, which is based upon its resolution of conflicting expert testimony.

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments, including that the trial court's decision after trial is inconsistent with our decision on summary judgment (see 168 AD3d 527 [1st Dept 2019]), and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: March 14, 2024



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehman Bros. Intl. v. AG Fin. Prods., Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 01346 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 01346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lehman-bros-intl-v-ag-fin-prods-inc-nyappdiv-2024.