Lehigh Valley R. v. Emens

231 F. 638, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1681
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 1916
DocketNo. 201
StatusPublished

This text of 231 F. 638 (Lehigh Valley R. v. Emens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lehigh Valley R. v. Emens, 231 F. 638, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1681 (2d Cir. 1916).

Opinion

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

This is a collision case, and the action is brought to recover for the death of the plaintiff’s testatrix, occasioned by defendant’s negligence. At the time the collision occurred the deceased was riding in an automobile. She was sitting on the back seat at the time of the accident in the company of her sister-in-law. The circumstances attending the collision appear in the cases of Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. v. Kilmer, 231 Fed. 628, — C. C. A. -, and Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. v. Emens, 231 Fed. 636, - C. C. A. - recently decided in this court, and the principles therein announced govern this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lehigh Valley R. v. Kilmer
231 F. 628 (Second Circuit, 1916)
Lehigh Valley R. v. Emens
231 F. 636 (Second Circuit, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 F. 638, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lehigh-valley-r-v-emens-ca2-1916.