Legnani v. Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane, S.P.A.

Second Circuit

Legnani v. Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane, S.P.A.

121 F. App'x 928

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 4, 2005

DocketNo. 03-9022

StatusPublished

This text of 121 F. App'x 928 (Legnani v. Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane, S.P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Legnani v. Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane, S.P.A., 121 F. App'x 928 (2d Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Familiarity by the parties is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues. Plaintiff-appellant, Josefina Legnani, brought an action against defendant-appellee, Alitalia Aeree Linee Italiane, S.P.A. (“Alitalia”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17, and under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, alleging unlawful retaliation and gender, age, and national origin discrimination. We consider the retaliatory discharge allegation of Legnani’s complaint in a separate opinion issued today. We affirm the district court’s dismissal of the remaining claims for the reasons stated by Judge Hellerstein.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Familiarity by the parties is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues. Plaintiff-appellant, Josefina Legnani, brought an action against defendant-appellee, Alitalia Aeree Linee Italiane, S.P.A. (“Alitalia”), under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17, and under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634, alleging unlawful retaliation and gender, age, and national origin discrimination. We consider the retaliatory discharge allegation of Legnani’s complaint in a separate opinion issued today. We affirm the district court’s dismissal of the remaining claims for the reasons stated by Judge Hellerstein.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED IN PART.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 F. App'x 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/legnani-v-alitalia-linee-aeree-italiane-spa-ca2-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack