Lefkowitz v. City of New York

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lefkowitz v. City of New York

116 N.Y.S. 683

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 116 N.Y.S. 683 (Lefkowitz v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lefkowitz v. City of New York, 116 N.Y.S. 683 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff was injured by being suddenly struck down by a horse and cart of the street cleaning department. Defendant offered no evidence. The jury found for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The trial court properly refused to dismiss the complaint. Therefore plaintiff was entitled to some amount of damages. See Meyers v. N. Y. City Ry. Co., 53 Misc. Rep. 650, 101 N. Y. Supp. 750.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff was injured by being suddenly struck down by a horse and cart of the street cleaning department. Defendant offered no evidence. The jury found for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The trial court properly refused to dismiss the complaint. Therefore plaintiff was entitled to some amount of damages. See Meyers v. N. Y. City Ry. Co., 53 Misc. Rep. 650, 101 N. Y. Supp. 750.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 N.Y.S. 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lefkowitz-v-city-of-new-york-nyappterm-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack