Hallahan v. Cambridge Hotel Co.

53 Misc. 650, 103 N.Y.S. 787
New York Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1907·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The tenant McCurdy in this proceeding moved in the Municipal Court for an order vacating and cancelling his .appearance, noted upon the precept by indorsement thereon, and appeals from the order made denying his motion. He has adopted a mistaken remedy. The order appealed from is not one of the orders enumerated in sections 253-257 of the Municipal Court Act and is, therefore, not appealable. White v. Lawyers Surety Co., 84 N. Y. Supp. 247.

Present: Gildebsleeve, Giegebich and Eblangeb, JJ.

Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars coste.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hallahan v. Cambridge Hotel Co., 53 Misc. 650, 103 N.Y.S. 787 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1907).

53 Misc. 650 (Hallahan v. Cambridge Hotel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lefkowitz v. City of New York
116 N.Y.S. 683 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)