Lefkowitz v. Beame

52 A.D.2d 925, 383 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12777
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 17, 1976·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel appellants to specifically perform the conditions of a certain contract, the appeal (by permission) is from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated March 5, 1975, which denied the appellants’ motion to change venue. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Article 78 proceedings preferably should be heard and determined in a county in the judicial district in which the matter sought to be restrained originated, or where the material events occurred (see CPLR 506; Matter of Lacqua v O’Connell, 280 App Div 31). The real property involved herein is located in Richmond County; the order for its sale and the transfer of the [926] proceeds of the sale to the Comptroller of the City of New York was made in Richmond County. The Staten Island War Memorial Association, Inc., has its principal office in the county in which the proceeding is pending. Special Term properly denied the motion by the appellants to change venue. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lefkowitz v. Beame, 52 A.D.2d 925, 383 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

52 A.D.2d 925 (Lefkowitz v. Beame) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

International Summit Equities Corp. v. Van Schoor
166 A.D.2d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Knight v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
110 Misc. 2d 196 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority
73 A.D.2d 399 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)