Lefkowitz v. Beame

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lefkowitz v. Beame

52 A.D.2d 925, 383 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12777

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 925 (Lefkowitz v. Beame) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lefkowitz v. Beame, 52 A.D.2d 925, 383 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel appellants to specifically perform the conditions of a certain contract, the appeal (by permission) is from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated March 5, 1975, which denied the appellants’ motion to change venue. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Article 78 proceedings preferably should be heard and determined in a county in the judicial district in which the matter sought to be restrained originated, or where the material events occurred (see CPLR 506; Matter of Lacqua v O’Connell, 280 App Div 31). The real property involved herein is located in Richmond County; the order for its sale and the transfer of the [926]*926proceeds of the sale to the Comptroller of the City of New York was made in Richmond County. The Staten Island War Memorial Association, Inc., has its principal office in the county in which the proceeding is pending. Special Term properly denied the motion by the appellants to change venue. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel appellants to specifically perform the conditions of a certain contract, the appeal (by permission) is from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated March 5, 1975, which denied the appellants’ motion to change venue. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Article 78 proceedings preferably should be heard and determined in a county in the judicial district in which the matter sought to be restrained originated, or where the material events occurred (see CPLR 506; Matter of Lacqua v O’Connell, 280 App Div 31). The real property involved herein is located in Richmond County; the order for its sale and the transfer of the [926]*926proceeds of the sale to the Comptroller of the City of New York was made in Richmond County. The Staten Island War Memorial Association, Inc., has its principal office in the county in which the proceeding is pending. Special Term properly denied the motion by the appellants to change venue. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 925, 383 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lefkowitz-v-beame-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack