Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Lacqua v. O'Connell

Lacqua v. O'Connell

280 A.D. 31, 111 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3387
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 280 A.D. 31 (Lacqua v. O'Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lacqua v. O'Connell, 280 A.D. 31, 111 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3387 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an article 78 of the Civil Practice Act proceeding to review the action of the State Liquor Authority with respect to certain premises located in the borough of Brooklyn, county of Kings, within the second judicial district and Second Department. While under section 1287 of the Civil Practice Act such a proceeding might be brought either in the county of New York, where the determination complained of was made, or in the county of Kings where the material facts took place, or in the county of Albany where the principal office of the respondent is located, it is the view of the Justices of the Appellate Divisions of both the First and Second Departments that such a proceeding can best be heard and determined where the material facts took place, that is in the judicial district embracing the county in which the premises are located.

It will be expected that future proceedings of this nature will be brought in the judicial district of such county.

This appeal, with the permission of the Justices of the Appellate Division of the Second Department, should be respectfully referred and transferred to the Appellate Division of the Second Department. Settle order.

Peck, P. J., G-lennon, Dobe, Van Voobhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Appeal, with the permission of the Justices of the Appellate Division of the Second Department, is respectfully referred and transferred to the Appellate Division of the Second Department. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Rozenberg v. Shea
2021 NY Slip Op 06783 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
DeCostello Carting, Inc. v. Maldonado
2004 NY Slip Op 50239(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2004)
Knight v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
110 Misc. 2d 196 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)
Ronco Communications & Electronics, Inc. v. Valentine
70 A.D.2d 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Lefkowitz v. Beame
52 A.D.2d 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Caparco v. Kaplan
36 Misc. 2d 653 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Manzi v. Kaplan
33 Misc. 2d 62 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Browne v. New York State Board of Parole
25 Misc. 2d 1050 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Anderson v. Board of Education
19 Misc. 2d 873 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Caro v. Weaver
15 Misc. 2d 558 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Eldred v. Monaghan
11 Misc. 2d 701 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
McDermott v. Johnson
1 Misc. 2d 55 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Barry v. O'Connell
281 A.D. 952 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 A.D. 31, 111 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lacqua-v-oconnell-nyappdiv-1952.