Lee v. Wilmington Savings Bank

114 S.E. 918, 29 Ga. App. 306, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 262
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1922
Docket13946
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 S.E. 918 (Lee v. Wilmington Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Wilmington Savings Bank, 114 S.E. 918, 29 Ga. App. 306, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 262 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. The right to remove a case from a State court to a Federal court, on the ground of diverse citizenship of the parties, is not given to a defendant who is a resident of the State where the suit is brought. U. S. Comp. Stat. (1918), § 1010; Martin v. Snyder, 148 U. S. 663 (13 Sup. Ct. 706, 37 L. ed. 602); Patch v. Wabash Railroad Co., 207 U. S. 277 (28 Sup. Ct. 80, 52 L. ed. 204, 12 Ann. Cas. 518).

2. Under the foregoing ruling the court did not err in denying the defendant’s petition to remove this cause from the superior court of [307]*307Newton county to the United States district court for the northern district of Georgia.

Decided December 13, 1922. Robert Lee, for plaintiff in error. J. Howell Oreen, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee v. Newton
136 S.E. 103 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 S.E. 918, 29 Ga. App. 306, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-wilmington-savings-bank-gactapp-1922.