Martin v. Snyder

148 U.S. 663, 13 S. Ct. 706, 37 L. Ed. 602, 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2262
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 17, 1893
Docket131
StatusPublished
Cited by53 cases

This text of 148 U.S. 663 (Martin v. Snyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Martin v. Snyder, 148 U.S. 663, 13 S. Ct. 706, 37 L. Ed. 602, 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2262 (1893).

Opinion

The Chief Justice :

This was a bill of complaint filed by Samuel F. Engs, George Engs and Henry Snyder, Jr., of the city, county and State of New York, against Morris T. Martin and Carrie E. Martin, in the Circuit Court of Lake County in the State of Illinois, on the 27th of October, 1887.

November 7, 1887, the defendants preferred a petition for the removal of the cause to. the United States Circuit Court Avithin and for the Northern District of Illinois on the ground of diverse citizenship, and the case was transferred accordingly.

The petition stated “that the controversy in said suit is between citizens -of different States, and that the petitioners Avere at the time of the commencement of this suit and still are citizens of the State of Illinois, and that all the plaintiffs Avere then and still are citizens u£ the State of New York.”

Under the act of Congress of March 3, 1887, 24 Stat. 652, c. 373, it is the defendant or defendants aaJio are non-residents *664 of the State in which the action is pending, who may remove the same into the Circuit Court of the United States for the proper district. The defendants here were not entitled to such removal, and the decree, which was in favor of complainants and from which the defendants prosecuted this appeal, must be reversed for want of jurisdiction, with costs against the appellants, and the case remanded to the Circuit Court with directions to render a judgment against them for cos'ts in that court, and to remand the case to the state court. Torrence v. Shedd, 144 U. S. 527, 533.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Christmas
D. New Mexico, 2024
Brendan Holbein v. Baxter Chrysler Jeep, Inc.
983 F.3d 1049 (Eighth Circuit, 2020)
Beritiech v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
881 F. Supp. 557 (S.D. Alabama, 1995)
Brooks v. District of Columbia
819 F. Supp. 67 (District of Columbia, 1993)
NATIONAL WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE CO., INC. v. Fischer
722 F. Supp. 554 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1989)
Harris v. Huffco Petroleum Corp.
633 F. Supp. 250 (S.D. Alabama, 1986)
Young & Simon, Inc. v. Bernstein
486 F. Supp. 1012 (D. Maryland, 1979)
Glenmede Trust Company v. Dow Chemical Company
384 F. Supp. 423 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1974)
Hudler v. Wilson
376 F. Supp. 592 (D. Colorado, 1974)
A. E. Staley Manufacturing Co. v. Fischback & Moore, Inc.
353 F. Supp. 578 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
Morrison v. Jack Richards Aircraft Co.
328 F. Supp. 580 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1971)
Diaz v. Montaner y Lizama
248 F. Supp. 153 (D. Puerto Rico, 1965)
Heintz & Co. v. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co.
228 F. Supp. 165 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1964)
Smith v. Voss Oil Co.
166 F. Supp. 905 (D. Wyoming, 1958)
Eriksen v. Moore Mill & Lumber Co.
157 F. Supp. 888 (D. Oregon, 1958)
Monroe v. United Carbon Co.
196 F.2d 455 (Fifth Circuit, 1952)
American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn
341 U.S. 6 (Supreme Court, 1951)
Rednor v. Pauly
87 F. Supp. 728 (S.D. Texas, 1949)
Kane v. Reichart Furniture Co.
68 F. Supp. 519 (N.D. West Virginia, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 U.S. 663, 13 S. Ct. 706, 37 L. Ed. 602, 1893 U.S. LEXIS 2262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-snyder-scotus-1893.