Lee v. State
139 S.E. 81, 37 Ga. App. 128, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 517
Opinion
1. The single ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial was based upon the alleged newly discovered testimony. However, the ground was not accompanied by an affidavit of the witness, and no reason was given for its non-production. The ground, therefore, was fatally defective. Berry v. State, 10 Ga. 511 (14) ; Suggs v. Anderson, 12 Ga. 461 (3), 464; White v. Wallen, 17 Ga. 106 (2); Burge v. State, 133 Ga. 431 (2) (66 S. E. 243).
2. The verdict whs amply authorized by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. State, 139 S.E. 81, 37 Ga. App. 128, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 517 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).
139 S.E. 81 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fowler v. State
45 S.E.2d 439 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)