Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Lee v. State

Lee v. State

153 S.E. 208, 41 Ga. App. 376, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 607
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 Ga. App. 773 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 16, 1930·No. 20381, 20382·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

In each of these cases the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, which was based upon the usual general grounds.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. J. A. Drake, for plaintiff in error. B. T. Castellow, solicitor-general, Bond Almand, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. State, 153 S.E. 208, 41 Ga. App. 376, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 607 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

153 S.E. 208 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.