Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lee v. State

Lee v. State

123 So. 3d 625, 2013 WL 4525289, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13675
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13714 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 28, 2013·No. No. 4D13-1030·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to the appellant filing a postconviction motion which includes predicate facts on which he seeks to avoid the time bars of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Wilson v. State, 105 So.3d 667, 668 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Piggott v. State, 14 So.3d 298, 299 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. State, 123 So. 3d 625, 2013 WL 4525289, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13675 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

123 So. 3d 625 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State
105 So. 3d 667 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Piggott v. State
14 So. 3d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)