Lee v. State

56 So. 3d 113, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3193, 2011 WL 798894
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 9, 2011·No. No. 3D10-3105·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LAGOA, J.

Appellant, Isaac Lee, appeals from an order denying his motion for mitigation of sentence filed pursuant to Rule 3.800(c), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure. We dismiss the appeal.

Notwithstanding the language in the trial court’s order of dismissal, the denial of a Rule 3.800(c) motion to mitigate is not an appealable order. See Mann v. State, 26 So.3d 664 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Falco v. State, 44 So.3d 198, 198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“Despite the language in the order of dismissal informing appellant that she [114]*114had thirty days to appeal, there is no right to appeal from the denial of a rule 3.800(c) motion.”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. State, 56 So. 3d 113, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3193, 2011 WL 798894 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

56 So. 3d 113 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Capote v. State
87 So. 3d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)