Falco v. State
44 So. 3d 198, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13625, 2010 WL 3564732
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 15, 2010·No. 4D09-4577·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Appellant appeals the denial of her rule 3.800(c) motion for reduction and/or mitigation of sentence. Despite the language in the order of dismissal informing appellant that she had thirty days to appeal, there is no right to appeal from the denial of a rule 3.800(c) motion. See Reeves v. State, 23 So.3d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Howard v. State, 914 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Falco v. State, 44 So. 3d 198, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13625, 2010 WL 3564732 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).
44 So. 3d 198 (Falco v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lee v. State
56 So. 3d 113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Edwards v. State
53 So. 3d 1131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Mosquera v. State
48 So. 3d 933 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)