Falco v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Falco v. State

44 So. 3d 198, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13625, 2010 WL 3564732

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 15, 2010

Docket4D09-4577

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 44 So. 3d 198 (Falco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Falco v. State, 44 So. 3d 198, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13625, 2010 WL 3564732 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of her rule 3.800(c) motion for reduction and/or mitigation of sentence. Despite the language in the order of dismissal informing appellant that she had thirty days to appeal, there is no right to appeal from the denial of a rule 3.800(c) motion. See Reeves v. State, 23 So.3d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Howard v. State, 914 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of her rule 3.800(c) motion for reduction and/or mitigation of sentence. Despite the language in the order of dismissal informing appellant that she had thirty days to appeal, there is no right to appeal from the denial of a rule 3.800(c) motion. See Reeves v. State, 23 So.3d 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); Howard v. State, 914 So.2d 455 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

WARNER, POLEN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 So. 3d 198, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13625, 2010 WL 3564732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falco-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack