Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lee v. State

Lee v. State

2 So. 3d 1115, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1377, 2009 WL 383619
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 939 So. 2d 154 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 2009·No. No. 4D08-3231·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges an order denying his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The substance of the motion, which was properly sworn, was a motion for postcon-viction relief pursuant to rule 3.850. We [1116]*1116treat appellant’s appeal as one from a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850 and affirm, as the record conclusively refutes appellant’s contentions or they are legally insufficient to grant relief.

WARNER, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. State, 2 So. 3d 1115, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1377, 2009 WL 383619 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

2 So. 3d 1115 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.