Lee v. State
Opinion
WILLIE R. LEE, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Willie R. Lee, pro se, Appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the appellant's response to this Court's order, dated August 9, 2006, we dismiss this appeal. The trial court found the appellant's claims in his rule 3.850 motion facially insufficient and dismissed the motion without prejudice to refile a facially sufficient motion. Rowe v. State, 932 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Therefore, the trial court's order is a nonappealable, nonfinal order. Williams v. State, 884 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
DISMISSED.
ALLEN, WEBSTER, and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
939 So. 2d 154 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.