Lee v. State
693 So. 2d 1143, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5616, 1997 WL 269183
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 666 So. 2d 209 →
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of relief based on the facial insufficiency of appellant’s motion under either Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) or Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c)(1996); Barfield v. State, 671 So.2d 820, 820-21 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Basnight v. State, 574 So.2d 307, 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. State, 693 So. 2d 1143, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5616, 1997 WL 269183 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
693 So. 2d 1143 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barfield v. State
671 So. 2d 820 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Basnight v. State
574 So. 2d 307 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)