Lee v. State

675 So. 2d 682, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6504, 1996 WL 332927
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 19, 1996·No. No. 94-945·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends, and the state concedes, that his guidelines sentence for armed sexual battery and armed burglary is based upon an error in the scoring of a prior Geor[683]*683gia burglary offense on his guidelines score-sheet. Specifically, the Georgia burglary was scored as a second-degree felony on the theory that the burglarized structure was a dwelling. However, as the record reveals and the state concedes, the Georgia statute does not recognize such a distinction and does not contain a separate element requiring that the burglarized structure be a dwelling. In Dautel v. State, 658 So.2d 88 (Fla. 1995), the supreme court held that only the elements of the out-of-state crime, and not the underlying facts, should be considered in determining the degree of the analogous Florida offense on a guidelines seoresheet. Consequently, the Georgia offense must be scored as a third-degree felony.

Accordingly, we vacate appellant’s sentence and remand the case for resentencing, with instructions to score the Georgia offense as a third-degree felony.

MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. State, 675 So. 2d 682, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6504, 1996 WL 332927 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

675 So. 2d 682 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MOISES SANCHEZ, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
Patrick Scott v. State of Florida
260 So. 3d 1147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)