Lee v. State

667 So. 2d 918, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 886, 1996 WL 47700
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 640 So. 2d 126
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 1996·No. No. 95-2366·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence and the restitution as ordered. We remand, however, with directions to delete the awards for court costs, investigative costs, a public defender lien, and a 4% surcharge. See McCray v. State, 665 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). On remand, the trial court may enter a written order reimposing some or all of these charges so long as specific statutory authority is provided for them.

BOOTH, JOANOS and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. State, 667 So. 2d 918, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 886, 1996 WL 47700 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

667 So. 2d 918 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
McCray v. State
665 So. 2d 384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)