Lee v. State
285 S.W.3d 248, 373 Ark. 590, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 369
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Ark. LEXIS 205 →
Opinion
Ledell Lee, by and through his attorney, Gerald Coleman, petitions this court to relieve Mr. Coleman as counsel, so that Lori Leon, counsel for Lee in a federal habeas case, may be appointed to represent Lee in this court. We must deny the petition, as Ms. Leon, an attorney in Kansas City, Missouri, has not filed a motion with this court requesting pro hac vice status or a motion to be appointed as counsel for Lee.
Petition denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. State, 285 S.W.3d 248, 373 Ark. 590, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 369 (Ark. 2008).
285 S.W.3d 248 (Lee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rutherford v. Mid-Delta Community Services, Inc.
285 S.W.3d 248 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2008)