Home/Supreme Court of Arkansas/Lee v. State

Lee v. State

285 S.W.3d 248, 373 Ark. 590, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 369
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 29, 2008
DocketCR 08-160
StatusPublished

This text of 285 S.W.3d 248 (Lee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. State, 285 S.W.3d 248, 373 Ark. 590, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 369 (Ark. 2008).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Ledell Lee, by and through his attorney, Gerald Coleman, petitions this court to relieve Mr. Coleman as counsel, so that Lori Leon, counsel for Lee in a federal habeas case, may be appointed to represent Lee in this court. We must deny the petition, as Ms. Leon, an attorney in Kansas City, Missouri, has not filed a motion with this court requesting pro hac vice status or a motion to be appointed as counsel for Lee.

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rutherford v. Mid-Delta Community Services, Inc.
285 S.W.3d 248 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
285 S.W.3d 248, 373 Ark. 590, 2008 Ark. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-state-ark-2008.