Lee v. Lee

169 S.W.3d 868, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1075, 2005 WL 1669003
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 19, 2005·No. ED 84948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Lee appeals the judgment of the trial court amending the amounts awarded to Deborah Lee for maintenance and child support on remand after this court’s ruling in Lee v. Lee, 117 S.W.3d 693 (Mo.App.2003). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. Lee, 169 S.W.3d 868, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1075, 2005 WL 1669003 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

169 S.W.3d 868 (Lee v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henson v. Dutch Flowers, L.L.C.
169 S.W.3d 868 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)