Lee v. Lee

169 S.W.3d 868, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1075, 2005 WL 1669003
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 19, 2005
DocketED 84948
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 S.W.3d 868 (Lee v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Lee, 169 S.W.3d 868, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1075, 2005 WL 1669003 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Lee appeals the judgment of the trial court amending the amounts awarded to Deborah Lee for maintenance and child support on remand after this court’s ruling in Lee v. Lee, 117 S.W.3d 693 (Mo.App.2003). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henson v. Dutch Flowers, L.L.C.
169 S.W.3d 868 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 S.W.3d 868, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1075, 2005 WL 1669003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-lee-moctapp-2005.