Henson v. Dutch Flowers, L.L.C.

169 S.W.3d 868, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1258, 2005 WL 2072133
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 30, 2005
DocketWD 64284
StatusPublished

This text of 169 S.W.3d 868 (Henson v. Dutch Flowers, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Henson v. Dutch Flowers, L.L.C., 169 S.W.3d 868, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1258, 2005 WL 2072133 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Minnie Henson and Celestine Broom appeal from a summary judgment denying their wrongful death claim against Dutch Flowers, L.L.C. Upon review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we find summary judgment was proper because there was no evidence to support a material element of the respondeat superior claim of liability against Dutch Flowers. The judgment is affirmed.

We have provided the parties with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee v. Lee
169 S.W.3d 868 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 S.W.3d 868, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1258, 2005 WL 2072133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/henson-v-dutch-flowers-llc-moctapp-2005.