Henson v. Dutch Flowers, L.L.C.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Henson v. Dutch Flowers, L.L.C.

169 S.W.3d 868, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1258, 2005 WL 2072133

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 30, 2005·No. WD 64284·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Minnie Henson and Celestine Broom appeal from a summary judgment denying their wrongful death claim against Dutch Flowers, L.L.C. Upon review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we find summary judgment was proper because there was no evidence to support a material element of the respondeat superior claim of liability against Dutch Flowers. The judgment is affirmed.

We have provided the parties with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Minnie Henson and Celestine Broom appeal from a summary judgment denying their wrongful death claim against Dutch Flowers, L.L.C. Upon review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we find summary judgment was proper because there was no evidence to support a material element of the respondeat superior claim of liability against Dutch Flowers. The judgment is affirmed.

We have provided the parties with a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision because a published opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b).

Henson v. Dutch Flowers, L.L.C., 169 S.W.3d 868, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1258, 2005 WL 2072133 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

169 S.W.3d 868 (Henson v. Dutch Flowers, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related