Lee v. Johnson

34 S.E. 568, 110 Ga. 286, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 571
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 8, 1899·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. Where a negotiable instrument is transferred before its maturity, in payment of a pre-existing debt, the transferee is a holder for value, and takes the paper free from the equities existing between the original parties. Bond v. Central Bank of Georgia, 2 Ga. 92; Gibson & Rood v. Conner, 3 Ga. 47.

Submitted November 10, Decided December 8, 1899. Complaint. Before Judge Williams. City court of Way-cross. January 23, 1899. Leon A. Wilson, for plaintiffs in error.

2. The evidence demanded the verdict for the plaintiff, and there was no error in directing the jury so to find.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. Johnson, 34 S.E. 568, 110 Ga. 286, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 571 (Ga. 1899).

34 S.E. 568 (Lee v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Few v. Pou
124 S.E. 372 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Farmers Bank v. Hood
113 S.E. 59 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Patterson & Co. v. Peterson
84 S.E. 163 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Harris v. Evans
67 S.E. 880 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Oliver v. Miller
60 S.E. 254 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Harrell v. National Bank of Commerce
57 S.E. 869 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)