Lee v. Johnson
This text of 34 S.E. 568 (Lee v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where a negotiable instrument is transferred before its maturity, in payment of a pre-existing debt, the transferee is a holder for value, and takes the paper free from the equities existing between the original parties. Bond v. Central Bank of Georgia, 2 Ga. 92; Gibson & Rood v. Conner, 3 Ga. 47.
2. The evidence demanded the verdict for the plaintiff, and there was no error in directing the jury so to find.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 S.E. 568, 110 Ga. 286, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-johnson-ga-1899.