Farmers Bank v. Hood
113 S.E. 59, 28 Ga. App. 744, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 820
Opinion
“ A note in the hands of a holder for a valuable consideration, transferred before due and without notice of any equities between the maker and the payee, either as payment or as collateral [745] security for an existing debt, is not liable to the equities between the maker and the payee. Gibson v. Conner, 3 Ga. 47; Kaiser v. U. S. National Bank, 99 Ga. 258; Lee v. Johnson, 110 Ga. 286.” Harrell v. National Bank, 128 Ga. 504, 507 (57 S. E. 869). Under this ruling the court erred in. refusing to sanction the certiorari.
•Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farmers Bank v. Hood, 113 S.E. 59, 28 Ga. App. 744, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 820 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).
113 S.E. 59 (Farmers Bank v. Hood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gibson v. Conner
3 Ga. 47 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1847)
Kaiser & Brother v. United States National Bank
25 S.E. 620 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)
Lee v. Johnson
34 S.E. 568 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Harrell v. National Bank of Commerce
57 S.E. 869 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)