Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Farmers Bank v. Hood

Farmers Bank v. Hood

113 S.E. 59, 28 Ga. App. 744, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 820
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 11, 1922
Docket13572
StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 59 (Farmers Bank v. Hood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farmers Bank v. Hood, 113 S.E. 59, 28 Ga. App. 744, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 820 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

“ A note in the hands of a holder for a valuable consideration, transferred before due and without notice of any equities between the maker and the payee, either as payment or as collateral [745]*745security for an existing debt, is not liable to the equities between the maker and the payee. Gibson v. Conner, 3 Ga. 47; Kaiser v. U. S. National Bank, 99 Ga. 258; Lee v. Johnson, 110 Ga. 286.” Harrell v. National Bank, 128 Ga. 504, 507 (57 S. E. 869). Under this ruling the court erred in. refusing to sanction the certiorari.

Decided July 11, 1922. Petition for certiorari; from Colquitt superior court — Judge Thomas. April 3, 1922. Dowling & Whelchel, for plaintiff.

•Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gibson v. Conner
3 Ga. 47 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1847)
Kaiser & Brother v. United States National Bank
25 S.E. 620 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1896)
Lee v. Johnson
34 S.E. 568 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Harrell v. National Bank of Commerce
57 S.E. 869 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 59, 28 Ga. App. 744, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farmers-bank-v-hood-gactapp-1922.