Lee v. Johnson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6118

HAROLD LEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON; MR. HAMMOND, T.P.S.; JOHN M. JABE; STANLEY YOUNG, Warden, Pocahontas State Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:10-cv-00247-gec-mfu)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Lee, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Harold Lee appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for a preliminary injunction. On appeal, we confine

our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See

4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Lee’s informal brief does not

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Lee

has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED