Lee v. Johnson

433 F. App'x 154
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 1, 2011
DocketNo. 11-6118
StatusPublished

This text of 433 F. App'x 154 (Lee v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lee v. Johnson, 433 F. App'x 154 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harold Lee appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Lee’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Lee has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and [155]*155legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
433 F. App'x 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lee-v-johnson-ca4-2011.