Lee v. Fulwood

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided April 3, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2011-1819·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) DARRON K. LEE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1819 (BAH) ) ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., ) ) Respondent. ) )

MEMORANDUM

By Order of March 1, 2012, Petitioner was directed to respond by April 2, 2012, to the

Government’s opposition to his petition for a writ of habeas corpus or risk summary dismissal

of the petition, ECF No. 11. Since December 2011, all orders mailed to Petitioner at his address

of record have been returned to the Clerk “as undeliverable,” ECF Nos. 6, 10, 12. Petitioner

appears to have abandoned his habeas petition. However, because he has not opposed the

government’s reasoned arguments against each claim raised in the petition, the Court will deny

the petition for the documented reasons the Government has advanced. See Gov’t’s Opp’n to

Pet’r’s Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 9, at 5-12 & Exhibits. A separate final order

accompanies this Memorandum.

/s/ Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATE: April 3, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. Fulwood, (D.D.C. 2012).

Lee v. Fulwood (Lee v. Fulwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.