Lee v. Fulwood
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
) DARRON K. LEE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1819 (BAH) ) ISAAC FULWOOD, JR., ) ) Respondent. ) )
MEMORANDUM
By Order of March 1, 2012, Petitioner was directed to respond by April 2, 2012, to the
Government’s opposition to his petition for a writ of habeas corpus or risk summary dismissal
of the petition, ECF No. 11. Since December 2011, all orders mailed to Petitioner at his address
of record have been returned to the Clerk “as undeliverable,” ECF Nos. 6, 10, 12. Petitioner
appears to have abandoned his habeas petition. However, because he has not opposed the
government’s reasoned arguments against each claim raised in the petition, the Court will deny
the petition for the documented reasons the Government has advanced. See Gov’t’s Opp’n to
Pet’r’s Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 9, at 5-12 & Exhibits. A separate final order
accompanies this Memorandum.
/s/ Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATE: April 3, 2012
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee v. Fulwood (Lee v. Fulwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.