Lee v. Fulwood

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 4, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2011-1895·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

) MARK ANTHONY LEE, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 11-1895 (BAH) ) ISAAC FULWOOD, JR. et al., ) ) Respondents. ) )

MEMORANDUM

By Order of April 16, 2012, Petitioner was directed to respond by May 17, 2012, to the

Government’s opposition to his petition for a writ of habeas corpus or risk summary dismissal

of the petition, ECF No. 9. Petitioner has neither filed a response nor moved for additional time

to do so. He therefore has not opposed Respondents’ documented reasons for denying the

petition, see Gov’t’s Opp’n to Pet’r’s Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 8, at 4-7, with

which the Court agrees and adopts for the purpose of denying the petition. A separate final

order accompanies this Memorandum.

/s/ Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATE: June 4, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. Fulwood, (D.D.C. 2012).

Lee v. Fulwood (Lee v. Fulwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.