Lee v. Commonwealth

218 S.W.2d 945, 309 Ky. 771, 1949 Ky. LEXIS 791
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)·Decided March 18, 1949·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Sims—

Overruling motion.

*772 Tommie Lee has filed, a motion here for an appeal from what he contends was a conviction of having intoxicating liquor in his. possession for the purpose of sale in local option territory where his punishment was fixed at a fine of $50 and 30 days in jail.

This record is very similar to the one referred to in our recent opinion of Coomer v. Commonwealth, 309 Ky. 575, 218 S.W.2d 393. There is a verdict in the instant case but there is no judgment. The order overruling the motion and grounds for a new trial granted the accused until the 11th day of the next terni to prepare a bill of exceptions, but no bill is incorporated in the record.

Since there is no judgment contained in the record, there is nothing from which an appeal may be prosecuted, hence we are without jurisdiction to entertain Lee’s motion and it is hereby overruled. See Gosney v. Commonwealth, 309 Ky. 187, 217 S.W.2d 225, and Coomer v. Commonwealth, 309 Ky. 575, 218 S.W.2d 393.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee v. Commonwealth, 218 S.W.2d 945, 309 Ky. 771, 1949 Ky. LEXIS 791 (Ky. 1949).

218 S.W.2d 945 (Lee v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Commonwealth
335 S.W.2d 328 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1960)
Gregory v. Commonwealth
237 S.W.2d 62 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1951)
Lee v. Commonwealth
219 S.W.2d 990 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1949)