Lee-Herrmann Co. v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 353

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee-Herrmann Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Cust. Ct. 49 →

United States Customs Court·Decided August 14, 1958·No. No. 62290; protest 311567-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

[354]*354Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise, described as tinfoil centerpieces, are in chief value of metal, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee-Herrmann Co. v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 353 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

41 Cust. Ct. 353 (Lee-Herrmann Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.