Lee Herrmann Co. v. United States
40 Cust. Ct. 583
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lee Herrmann Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Cust. Ct. 49 →
United States Customs Court·Decided May 28, 1958·No. No. 62018; protest 311393-K (B) (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass bead Christmas tree ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of Walco Bead Co., Inc. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 1445), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee Herrmann Co. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 583 (cusc 1958).
40 Cust. Ct. 583 (Lee Herrmann Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walco Bead Co. v. United States
29 Cust. Ct. 62 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)