Lee Bros. v. Bewley-Darst Coal Co.

97 S.E. 99, 22 Ga. App. 693, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 689
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 16, 1918·No. 9594·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Where an executory contract for the sale of goods provides for the- delivery of the goods on order during a certain period, time is of the essence of the contract, and a failure to order delivery during -that period, terminates the right to order shipment of the goods. Bearden Mercantile Co. v. Madison Oil Co., 128 Ga. 605. (58 S. E. 200); Caddick Milling Co. v. Moultrie Grocery Co., 22 Ga. App. 524 (96 S. E. 583). See Gude v. Bailey Co., 4 Ga. App. 226 (61 S. E. 135).

2. The evidence demanded a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. It was not error, for any reason assigned, to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J.-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee Bros. v. Bewley-Darst Coal Co., 97 S.E. 99, 22 Ga. App. 693, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 689 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

97 S.E. 99 (Lee Bros. v. Bewley-Darst Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Helmer v. Wilson & Co.
123 S.E. 901 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Ladd Lime & Stone Co. v. MacDougald Construction Co.
114 S.E. 75 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)