Lee Ann Cholopisa v. Roy William Cholopisa
Opinion
NUMBER 13-14-00042-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
LEE ANN CHOLOPISA, Appellant,
v.
ROY WILLIAM CHOLOPISA, Appellee.
On appeal from the 87th District Court of Limestone County, Texas.
ORDER Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes Order Per Curiam
Appellant’s retained counsel, Chad Morgan, has filed a motion to withdraw as
counsel and a motion for extension of time to file the brief.1 We GRANT said motions.
1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.). Appellant’s unopposed first motion for extension of time is granted until June 16, 2014.
Pursuant to Rule 6.5(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, counsel is
directed to notify appellant, in writing, of any previously undisclosed deadlines and file a
copy of that notice with the Clerk of this Court. Appellant is directed to notify the Court
promptly if she retains new counsel on appeal by filing a notice including that attorney’s
name, mailing address, telephone number, facsimile number, email address, and State
Bar of Texas identification number. See generally TEX. R. APP. P. 6.
In the interim, the Court expects this appeal to proceed as per the appellate rules.
Appellant is expected to comply with all applicable deadlines and filings should comply
with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 10th day of June, 2014.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lee Ann Cholopisa v. Roy William Cholopisa (Lee Ann Cholopisa v. Roy William Cholopisa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.