Lee Ann Cholopisa v. Roy William Cholopisa

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 10, 2014·No. 13-14-00042-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00042-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

LEE ANN CHOLOPISA, Appellant,

v.

ROY WILLIAM CHOLOPISA, Appellee.

On appeal from the 87th District Court of Limestone County, Texas.

ORDER TO FILE BRIEF Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s second motion for extension of time

to file the brief. Appellant=s brief was originally due to be filed on May 27, 2014, and this

Court has previously granted appellant an extension for the filing of appellant=s brief in

this cause. Appellant has filed her second motion requesting additional time to file the appellate brief in this cause.

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's second motion for

extension of time to file the brief, the extension previously granted in this cause, and

appellee’s response, is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant's second

motion for extension of time to file the brief should be granted with order.

Appellant is hereby ORDERED to file a brief within 30 days from the date of this

order. The brief shall comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.1. If appellant fails to file a brief, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want

of prosecution and appellant’s failure to comply with this Court’s directive and the

appellate rules. See id. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 10th day of July, 2014.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lee Ann Cholopisa v. Roy William Cholopisa, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Lee Ann Cholopisa v. Roy William Cholopisa (Lee Ann Cholopisa v. Roy William Cholopisa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.