Ledwell v. County of Randolph

229 S.E.2d 836, 31 N.C. App. 522, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2033
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 17, 1976
Docket7619SC467
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 229 S.E.2d 836 (Ledwell v. County of Randolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ledwell v. County of Randolph, 229 S.E.2d 836, 31 N.C. App. 522, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2033 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

BROCK, Chief Judge.

When plaintiff served his proposed record on appeal on defendants, defendants filed exceptions. Plaintiff requested settlement of the record on appeal by the trial judge.

On 6 May 1976 the trial judge entered his order settling the record on appeal. The North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 11(e) provides that “[wjithin 10 days after the record on appeal has been settled . . . the appellant shall present the items constituting the record on appeal to the clerk of superior court for certification.” Appellant in this case waited from 6 May 1976 until 27 May 1976 to obtain the clerk’s certification, a total of 21 days.

The time schedules set out in the rules are designed to keep the process of perfecting an appeal to the appellate division flowing in an orderly manner. Counsel is not permitted to decide upon his own enterprise how long he will wait to take his next step in the appellate process. There are generous provisions for extensions of time by the trial court if counsel can show good cause for extension.

The North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. “These rules govern procedure in all appeals from the courts of the trial divisions to the courts of the appellate division; ...” App. R. 1(a).

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Parker and Hedrick concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. Carver
622 S.E.2d 718 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Holland v. Heavner
595 S.E.2d 224 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Kellihan v. Thigpen
538 S.E.2d 232 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Taylor v. City of Lenoir
536 S.E.2d 848 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Harvey v. Stokes
527 S.E.2d 336 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Craver v. Craver
258 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1979)
State v. Crouch
255 S.E.2d 192 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
City of Hickory v. Catawba Valley Machinery Co.
248 S.E.2d 71 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
State v. Johnson
247 S.E.2d 286 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
White v. Lawrence
236 S.E.2d 30 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
State v. Gilliam
235 S.E.2d 421 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
Indian Trace Co. v. Sanders
235 S.E.2d 91 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
State v. Lesley
234 S.E.2d 476 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
Byrd v. Alexander
233 S.E.2d 654 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)
Matter of Allen
230 S.E.2d 423 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 S.E.2d 836, 31 N.C. App. 522, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ledwell-v-county-of-randolph-ncctapp-1976.