Byrd v. Alexander

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Byrd v. Alexander

233 S.E.2d 654, 32 N.C. App. 782, 1977 N.C. App. LEXIS 2065

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedApril 6, 1977

Docket7611SC814

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 233 S.E.2d 654 (Byrd v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byrd v. Alexander, 233 S.E.2d 654, 32 N.C. App. 782, 1977 N.C. App. LEXIS 2065 (N.C. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

BROCK, Chief Judge.

The record on appeal in this case was certified by the clerk of superior court on 3 September 1976. App. R. 12(a) requires that appellant shall file the record on appeal in the appellate division within ten days after certification by the clerk of the trial tribunal. The record on appeal in this case was filed in the Court of Appeals on 1 October 1976, more than ten days after certification.

Perhaps it is well to repeat again what was said in Ledwell v. County of Randolph, 31 N.C. App. 522, 229 S.E. 2d 836 (1976), and In re Allen, 31 N.C. App. 597, 230 S.E. 2d 423 (1976):

“The time schedules set out in the rules are designed to keep the process of perfecting an appeal to the appellate division flowing in an orderly manner. Counsel is not permitted to decide upon his own enterprise how long he will wait to take his next step in the appellate process. There are generous provisions for extensions of time by the trial court if counsel can show good cause for extension.

“The North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure are mandatory. ‘These rules govern procedure in all appeals from the courts of the trial divisions to the courts of the appellate division; . . .’ App. R. 1(a).”

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Parker and Arnold concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI