Ledbetter v. Gibbs

91 S.E. 875, 19 Ga. App. 485, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 180
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 16, 1917
Docket7797
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 875 (Ledbetter v. Gibbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ledbetter v. Gibbs, 91 S.E. 875, 19 Ga. App. 485, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 180 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Etjke, J.

1. A landlord is not liable for injuries sustained by the tenant’s wife because of the defective condition of certain steps, unless it be shown that the landlord had notice of the defective condition of the steps, and failed to repair within a reasonable time. Civil Code (1910), § 3694; Ocean Steamship Co. v. Hamilton, 112 Ga. 901 (38 S. E. 204); Roach v. LeGree, 18 Ga. App. 250 (89 S. E. 167).

■ 2. When rented premises become out of repair it is the duty of the tenant to abstain from the use of that part of the premises, the use of which is attended'with danger. It is his duty to use ordinary care; and if by the use of such care the consequences even of the defendant’s negligence could have been avoided, he can not recover. Civil Code (1910), § 4426; Bell v. Walsh, 137 Ga. 350 (73 S. E. 585); Stack v. Harris, 111 Ga. 149 (36 S. E. 615) ; Donehoe v. Crane, 141 Ga. 224 (80 S. E. 712); Alexander v. Owen, 18 Ga. App. 326 (89 S. E. 437).

3. The notice to the landlord as testified to by the tenant.was not such notice under the law as would call the landlord’s attention to any defects in the steps which caused the plaifitiff’s alleged injury in May; and the court did not err in confining the jury to the issues raised as to the alleged injury of December, occasioned by the alleged defective condition of the porch.

4. The issues were fully and fairly submitted to the jury, and upon the questions of fact the jury found against the plaintiff. This verdict having the approval of the court, and there being no errors of law in the charge of the court or in the admission of evidence, the court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oliver v. Complements, Ltd.
378 S.E.2d 154 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Phelps v. Consolidated Equities Corp.
210 S.E.2d 337 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Black v. New Holland Baptist Church
178 S.E.2d 571 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Fincher v. Fox
131 S.E.2d 651 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Ball v. Murray
86 S.E.2d 706 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
White v. Thacker
80 S.E.2d 699 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Shattles v. Blanchard
73 S.E.2d 112 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Cone v. Lawhon
7 S.E.2d 597 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Lee v. Malone
191 S.E. 494 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Yancey v. Peters
174 S.E. 182 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Williams v. Mayes
166 S.E. 876 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Parker v. Miller
153 S.E. 619 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Jackson v. Davis
147 S.E. 913 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Duncan v. Platshek
135 S.E. 508 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Bullard v. Asa G. Candler Inc.
122 S.E. 813 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
McGee v. Hardacre
107 S.E. 563 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Williams v. Jones
106 S.E. 616 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 875, 19 Ga. App. 485, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ledbetter-v-gibbs-gactapp-1917.