Leday v. Lake Charles Pipe & Supply Co.

182 So. 148, 1938 La. App. LEXIS 302
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 14, 1938·No. No. 1867.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

LE BLANC, Judge.

In this, case we have a situation regarding the entry and signing of a' judg•ment which is practically identical with that presented in the case of John Delahoussaye v. D. M. Glazer & Company, Inc., et al., La.App., 182 So. 146, in which an opinion and decree were this day handed down dismissing the appeal as having been prematurely taken. Like that suit, the present one is also a suit for compensation in which the district judge after trial handed down written reasons for judgment which can not be said to constitute a judgment inasmuch as it condemns no one nor does it contain any decree whatever.

As in the case referred to there is no final judgment on which to base the appeal and in the absence of such judgment the-court will on its own motion dismiss the same.

For these reasons and for the further reasons stated in the opinion in the case of Delahoussaye v. Glazer & Co. Inc., this day handed down, it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that the appeal herein be dismissed as having been prematurely taken. Plaintiff to pay all costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leday v. Lake Charles Pipe & Supply Co., 182 So. 148, 1938 La. App. LEXIS 302 (La. Ct. App. 1938).

182 So. 148 (Leday v. Lake Charles Pipe & Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brawley v. Landreneau
170 So. 2d 673 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Smith v. Marino
26 So. 2d 760 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1946)
Johnson v. Hillyer, Deutsch, Edwards, Inc.
186 So. 365 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1939)
Leday v. Lake Charles Pipe & Supply Co.
185 So. 655 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1939)
Spector v. Union City Transfer
182 So. 524 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1938)