Leclerc v. Webb

Fifth Circuit

Leclerc v. Webb

444 F.3d 428

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 28, 2006

Docket03-30752, 03-31009

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 444 F.3d 428 (Leclerc v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leclerc v. Webb, 444 F.3d 428 (5th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Bane as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and who are not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed.R. App. P. and 5th Cir. R. 35), the [429]*429petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Bane as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and who are not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed.R. App. P. and 5th Cir. R. 35), the [429]*429petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 F.3d 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leclerc-v-webb-ca5-2006.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack