Leclerc v. Webb

Fifth Circuit

Leclerc v. Webb

444 F.3d 428

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2006·No. 03-30752, 03-31009·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Bane as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and who are not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed.R. App. P. and 5th Cir. R. 35), the [429] petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Treating the Petition for Rehearing En Bane as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and who are not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed.R. App. P. and 5th Cir. R. 35), the [429] petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Leclerc v. Webb, 444 F.3d 428 (5th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

444 F.3d 428 (Leclerc v. Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related