LeBlanc v. State
Opinion
Roger D. LEBLANC, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Kevin R. Holtz, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey R. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant's first point, the legality of the fines imposed as part of his habitual offender sentence, was not preserved by contemporaneous objection or rule 3.800 motion. Accordingly, we affirm on this point without prejudice for Appellant to file a rule 3.800 motion. Polite v. State, 847 So.2d 1156, 1157 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
We also affirm as to Appellant's second point. See Massey v. State, 609 So.2d 598 (Fla.1992).
AFFIRMED.
PALMER, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
985 So. 2d 1233 (LeBlanc v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.