Polite v. State

847 So. 2d 1156, 2003 WL 21471696
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 27, 2003·No. 5D02-2856·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

847 So.2d 1156 (2003)

Selena POLITE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D02-2856.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 27, 2003.

*1157 James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges her sentences on the basis that the written sentences do not conform to the oral pronouncement of the judge. Although she might be correct, this issue was not preserved for review on direct appeal. Washington v. State, 814 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. dismissed, 831 So.2d 675 (Fla.2002). The judgment and sentence are, therefore, affirmed without prejudice for appellant to file a motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON, GRIFFIN and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polite v. State, 847 So. 2d 1156, 2003 WL 21471696 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

847 So. 2d 1156 (Polite v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conley v. State
146 So. 3d 1266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
LeBlanc v. State
985 So. 2d 1233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Williams v. State
957 So. 2d 600 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
Aument v. State
868 So. 2d 682 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Berthiaume v. State
864 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Pittman v. State
859 So. 2d 555 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)