Lease Acceptance Corp. v. Abel

Michigan Supreme Court

Lease Acceptance Corp. v. Abel

483 Mich. 1134

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 17, 2009

DocketNo. 138009

StatusPublished

This text of 483 Mich. 1134 (Lease Acceptance Corp. v. Abel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lease Acceptance Corp. v. Abel, 483 Mich. 1134 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinions

Summary Disposition July 17, 2009:

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the order of the Oakland Circuit Court dismissing the plaintiffs consolidated actions with prejudice relative to future litigation in Michigan between the parties concerning the subject matter of the underlying lawsuit and without prejudice relative to future litigation outside Michigan. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Michigan was not “a reasonably convenient place for the trial of the action,” MCL 600.745(2)(b), when considering the factors supplied in Cray v Gen Motors Corp, 389 Mich 382, 395-396 (1973). See also Lease Acceptance Corp v Adams, 272 Mich App 209 (2006). The motion to dismiss and request for sanctions is denied. Court of Appeals No. 278716.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Summary Disposition July 17, 2009:

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the order of the Oakland Circuit Court dismissing the plaintiffs consolidated actions with prejudice relative to future litigation in Michigan between the parties concerning the subject matter of the underlying lawsuit and without prejudice relative to future litigation outside Michigan. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Michigan was not “a reasonably convenient place for the trial of the action,” MCL 600.745(2)(b), when considering the factors supplied in Cray v Gen Motors Corp, 389 Mich 382, 395-396 (1973). See also Lease Acceptance Corp v Adams, 272 Mich App 209 (2006). The motion to dismiss and request for sanctions is denied. Court of Appeals No. 278716.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

483 Mich. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lease-acceptance-corp-v-abel-mich-2009.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack