Leach v. Town of Eastchester & Eaton Hall, Inc.

263 A.D. 898, 32 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7269
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 26, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 263 A.D. 898 (Leach v. Town of Eastchester & Eaton Hall, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leach v. Town of Eastchester & Eaton Hall, Inc., 263 A.D. 898, 32 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7269 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from' plaintiff’s fall on a defective sidewalk, in a crack in which her foot caught, throwing her, judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon the direction of the trial court,.dismissing the complaint at the close of all the proofs, reversed on the law and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. The learned trial justice erred in granting the motion to dismiss. There were issues [899]*899of fact for the jury relating to the defendants’ alleged liability and plaintiff’s damages. Taking the evidence in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff (Lombardi v. New York State Railways, 224 App. Div. 438), the jury might have found that the crack in the sidewalk in which plaintiff’s foot caught, causing her fall, was such as to impose liability on the defendants within the purview of the rulings in Moroney v. City of New York (117 App. Div. 843; affd., 190 N. Y. 560); Moshier v. City of New York (190 App. Div. 111, 115); Terry v. Village of Perry (199 N. Y. 79) and kindred cases. ' Appeal from order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty and Taylor, JJ., concur: Carswell and Adel, JJ., concur in the dismissal Of the appeal from the order but dissent as to the reversal of the judgment and the granting of a new trial, and vote to affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liebl v. Metropolitan Jockey Club
10 A.D.2d 1006 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Noonan v. Paine
267 A.D. 1035 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D. 898, 32 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leach-v-town-of-eastchester-eaton-hall-inc-nyappdiv-1942.