Le Grand v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Le Grand v. Travis

309 A.D.2d 1091, 766 N.Y.S.2d 402, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 309 A.D.2d 1091 (Le Grand v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Le Grand v. Travis, 309 A.D.2d 1091, 766 N.Y.S.2d 402, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Rose, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Spargo, J.), entered July 26, [1092]*10922002 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Since the February 2001 determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and has again been denied release. Consequently, the matter is now rendered moot and the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Boddie v New York State Div. of Parole, 306 AD2d 661 [2003]; Matter of Parker v Executive Dept. Div. of Parole, 298 AD2d 782 [2002]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Spargo, J.), entered July 26, [1092]*10922002 in Ulster County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Since the February 2001 determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and has again been denied release. Consequently, the matter is now rendered moot and the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Boddie v New York State Div. of Parole, 306 AD2d 661 [2003]; Matter of Parker v Executive Dept. Div. of Parole, 298 AD2d 782 [2002]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 A.D.2d 1091, 766 N.Y.S.2d 402, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/le-grand-v-travis-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack