Davidson v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davidson v. Travis

3 A.D.3d 826, 770 N.Y.S.2d 911, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 870

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 A.D.3d 826 (Davidson v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davidson v. Travis, 3 A.D.3d 826, 770 N.Y.S.2d 911, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered May 29, 2003 in Franklin County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Since the December 2001 determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release has again been denied. Consequently, this matter is now rendered moot and the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Le Grand v Travis, 309 AD2d 1091 [2003]).

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered May 29, 2003 in Franklin County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Since the December 2001 determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release has again been denied. Consequently, this matter is now rendered moot and the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Le Grand v Travis, 309 AD2d 1091 [2003]).

Spain, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.3d 826, 770 N.Y.S.2d 911, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-travis-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack