Le Beau v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Company

808 F.2d 1272
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 7, 1987
Docket85-1242
StatusPublished

This text of 808 F.2d 1272 (Le Beau v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Le Beau v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Company, 808 F.2d 1272 (7th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

808 F.2d 1272

42 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1895

Lorraine LE BEAU, et al., Plaintiffs,
and
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,
Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant,
v.
LIBBEY-OWENS-FORD COMPANY, An Ohio Corporation, and Local
19, United Glass and Ceramic Workers, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 85-1242.

United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.

Jan. 7, 1987.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division; James B. Parsons, Judge.

Before BAUER, Chief Judge and CUMMINGS, WOOD, CUDAHY, POSNER, COFFEY, FLAUM, EASTERBROOK, RIPPLE and MANION, Circuit Judges.

Prior Report: 799 F.2d 1152.

ORDER

This case is before the court on petitions for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc filed by Libbey-Owens-Ford Company and Local 19, United Glass and Ceramic Workers. On consideration of the petitions for rehearing, the court on its own motion modifies the opinion as follows:On page 1159, line 5 of footnote nine, delete the sentence beginning "The first mention...."

On page 1160, 2d col. line 15, the citation to the "1982 District Court Opinion at 27 n. 5" is modified to "1982 District Court Opinion at 6 n. 2 p (5)".

On further consideration of the petitions for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc, a vote of the active members of the court was requested and less than a majority* of the members of the court have voted to grant a rehearing en banc. A majority of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny the petitions for rehearing. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid petitions for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc be, and the same are, hereby DENIED.

*

Chief Judge Bauer, and Circuit Judges Posner, Coffey and Easterbrook voted to grant petitions for rehearing en banc. Senior Circuit Judge Eschbach was a member of the original panel, but did not participate in the vote on suggestion for rehearing en banc

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Le Beau v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Co.
808 F.2d 1272 (Seventh Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
808 F.2d 1272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/le-beau-v-libbey-owens-ford-company-ca7-1987.